Dear Dr. Phil,

Your recent show has made it very clear that you don’t understand what Attachment Parenting is all about. You have confused it with permissive and narcissistic parenting, which is very much not in line with AP in the slightest. You have highlighted permissive and narcissistic parenting styles and have called them “Attachment Parenting”.

Not knowing the meaning of the word “no” is permissive parenting. A permissive parent is a selfish brat who places their own need to be loved by their child ahead of what the child actually needs. A permissive parent will give their child a cookie if the child throws a tantrum. Or will just buy cookies to give to the child because they think the child wants cookies. A permissive parent will face their child forwards in the car seat before the child is ready to face forwards safely because “they want to see things!” Permissive parenting actually crosses over a lot into mainstream parenting in those ways.

Not allowing a child to spend time with anyone other than themselves is selfish abusive parenting, or is the parenting of someone who has legitimate concerns for their child’s safety. Attachment Parents generally place tremendous value on family and friends and believe in fostering relationships with many people so that their children have a wide network of emotional support and a lot of people to learn from.

Attachment Parents view separation anxiety as a natural part of infancy that fades when the child is able to understand certain things and when the child’s desire to explore and be around other children outweighs the child’s need to keep us in eyesight all the time. We believe in working with our children to become comfortable with the idea of being in different environments with different people at different times in their lives. We understand that if separation anxiety persists or becomes worse it is a social anxiety that needs to be overcome.

Attachment Parents recognize that children have many different personality attributes just as they may have different hair colors, eye colors, different body types, different facial features, and hair of different textures. We understand that our parenting needs to adapt with each different child because a “one size fits all” approach of any sort is doomed for failure.

Attachment Parents do not sleep with their children against their child’s will. Attachment parents sleep with children that need more nighttime parenting, and encourage independent sleep in those who are fine with that independence. (I personally LOVE to sleep without small feet in my eyeballs, and with more than an inch or two of space to myself.)

Attachment Parenting is not threatening my relationship with my partner. It is making my relationship with him stronger. By talking about parenting issues that we face, we listen to each other and we approach things as a team rather than one of us declaring that our way is The Only Way to Do Something. I listen to my partner with every bit as much zeal as I listen to my children.

Indulgent parenting takes the easy way out by throwing everything under the sun at their kids in the hopes that the parent can avoid doing any real work and the child will obey out of appreciation.

Strict parenting takes another easy way out by refusing to acknowledge the validity of emotions such as anger, sadness and disappointment. Strict parenting labels legitimate emotions as “manipulative” and tries to wall children off from their parents so that the parents will be sheltered from the emotions that the children have.

Attachment parenting is a lot of hard work. It means LISTENING. It means understanding. It means working with the child. Attachment parents don’t hide from the difficult emotions- be it through giving the child everything that they want or through putting our feet down and declaring that the child’s deepest feelings are just an attempt at controlling us.

I think that if you learned a little bit more about what Attachment Parenting really is.. Maybe you’d be ready to let go of the controversy and focus on something that truly damages children.

You can just as easily do a show on indulgent parenting, which is very damaging. Or a show on the effect of discouraging our children from expressing emotions rather than helping them understand what it is that they’re feeling.

Somehow I doubt that you have any interest in doing that, though. It’s easier to hold onto what we think we know than it is to listen to the things that we think we disagree with.

-Sarah

S. Avatar

Published by

Categories:

15 responses to “Dear Dr. Phil”

  1. Donna Avatar

    This letter could make them want you on the show even more. Guaranteed if you offer to bring your nursing 7 month old. It sickens me to see what a sewer valuable TV time has become, when they could do so much good and help people instead of making them a spectacle to make money.

    Like

    1. sarah Avatar
      sarah

      They wouldn’t want me on the show. AND I would not go on the show.

      Like

  2. Beth Avatar
    Beth

    Did you send him a copy of this? I sooo want to see his response! It drives me nuts the way AP is portrayed in the media…gotta fuel the mommy wars for their own profit and amusement.

    Like

    1. sarah Avatar
      sarah

      He gets so much mail I doubt he would respond.

      Like

  3. The Mommy Psychologist Avatar

    I was actually on the show. I was the woman in green in the beginning. I’m a child psychologist as well as a mom. I was contacted by Dr. Phil’s producers to come on the show and to speak about attachment parenting. What you need to remember is that this is taped television. The segment on attachment parenting took over two hours tape. What you saw on TV when it aired as a 15 minute clip, spliced together with lots cut out. In all actuality, there was a very educated and lively discussion from both sides on the issue. Just needed to point it out.

    “The child psychologist who thought she had all the answers to parenting until she became one herself.” http://www.themommypsychologist.com

    Like

    1. sarah Avatar
      sarah

      Heather,

      Thanks for leaving the comment.

      I’m sure that the discussion was spirited and educated. The problem that I have is not with the discussion that took place during the taping, it’s with what was aired.

      If a popular talk show host had someone similar to Mother Theresa come on to talk about Judeo-Christian religions and the show that aired portrayed Judeo-Christian religions as all being in the same category as the Westboro Baptist Church, I’m guessing that most Christians and Catholics would take serious offense even if the discussion behind the 15 minute soundbite was lively and educated.

      I receive a large number of hits on my website from moms that are lovingly parenting their children “in the closet” because AP has been so marginalized that mothers feel guilty for picking their babies up when they cry, and wonder if they are harming their child by not forcing them to cry it out.

      AP is not for everyone, but the perpetuation of confusion about the distinctions between AP and permissive/narcissistic parenting are very damaging to many parent/child relationships that could otherwise be very loving and close. Dr. Phil’s show- the segments that WERE AIRED.. perpetuates that confusion that damages relationships for no good reason.

      I object to that.

      Dr. Phil’s show is his “public stance”, regardless of discussions that he has. If he allows his public stance to be that 15 minute soundbyte that shows a lack of understanding as to the difference between permissive parenting and AP parenting, then he is publicly choosing to be confused. To everyone who was not in that room when the full taping happened, he IS confused unless he clarifies what his view of AP is and makes some sort of differentiation between permissive and AP styles.

      -Sarah

      Like

      1. The Mommy Psychologist Avatar

        Thanks, Sarah. Here’s where I think the problem exists. The media is only existed in portraying the extremes. Hence, the reason they selected the mother that they chose to portray. They chose a mother who said- “I never tell my child no” which as we both know is not a central tenet of Attachment Parenting. They chose a mother who has a son whose nickname for her breasts is “money” which of course we all know is guaranteed to ignite controversy as well. They selected someone who would perpetuate the stereotypes that exist regarding attachment parenting. The reason being that the media is never so much interested in conscious discussion about opposing viewpoints as they are in igniting people’s emotions for ratings.

        I would love to see a group of parents from both sides of the debate engage in a respectful dialogue regarding their parenting choices. But unfortunately, I’m fairly certain nobody would watch it. I think that’s the saddest part in all of this.

        Like

      2. sarah Avatar
        sarah

        Which extreme did you portray? 🙂 I’m guessing you represent a more mainstream non-AP parenting style?

        Unfortunately I’m deaf and sort of boycott television so my commentary is based on second-hand descriptions. Sort of like Dr. Phil’s understanding of attachment parenting.

        If they want to do shows on extreme parenting, that makes sense. It’s just sort of obnoxious to see a loving and healthy practice supported by the World Health Organization and scientific evidence portrayed alongside someone being verbally abusive to a kid over a fashion choice, and a grandmother who breaks into places to check up on her grown children. Just as it would be jarring to see “EXTREME RELIGION” feature missionaries “crazy enough to risk their lives” to help someone else’s kid by going into a developing nation and helping dig wells and someone who performs exorcisms on mentally ill/mentally disabled children alongside people blowing up abortion clinics and picketing the funerals of soldiers.

        *Edit: Out of curiosity I just read the synopsis of your book on Amazon. I love the approach that your book seems to take. It’s rare these days.

        Like

  4. Danielle Avatar
    Danielle

    So true! Please send a copy of your letter into the show. Even if they don’t respond it would be great for a producer or two to read it!

    Like

  5. Kathy Avatar
    Kathy

    I am the mom that was on. I am the one who “promotes the stereotypes” as you said above. It’s actually surprisingly common to have a child call nursing “money” as well as many other silly nicknames. My 1 year old calls them “nee nee”. I know, not neat as inflammatory or stereotypical. You think they spliced and edited the show? Well, they also spliced the interview at my home where I stated by not saying no, it makes us pause to think and figure out more creative or logical ways to demonstrate no. I didn’t say we don’t say no. I try to limit my use of the word. The only reason for that is, for me personally, it would be easy to say no and not explain myself. By reconsidering that one word, I can teach my child better. For example:
    “Can I go outside?”
    “No.”
    Or, if I’m challenged to think more:
    “Can I go outside?”
    “Not right now because I’m making dinner and can’t watch you. You can set the table!”

    My husband and I laughed after the taping in our home. We couldn’t imagine our mundane life being any form of entertainment. And the day that they taped is in thousands of other homes as people just raise kids with an awareness and sense of respect. Do I tell my kid no? Of course I do! Did he wean when he was ready. Of course he did. Does he cosleep, yes, still quite often. It’s ridiculous how hard they have to work to make my quiet life entertaining.

    I was glad to be on the show and have ap out again on another platform. My husband and I knew going in to it it would be the usual spin media makes it look like. They make Mayim Balick and Dr Sears look bad.

    Like

    1. sarah Avatar
      sarah

      Kathy-

      Sounds like we’re pretty similar there, then. 🙂 “No” becomes a nonsense word when it’s used all the time because it’s short and with no more context.

      It doesn’t surprise me that you were edited. And it’s good to know what the truth is and that you don’t “promote the stereotypes” so much as Dr. Phil tried to use you to promote the stereotypes. Not surprising, as you say he also used everyone else in the same way.

      -Sarah

      Like

  6. Kathy Avatar
    Kathy

    The whole time I was on, I felt like my ‘opponents’ had researched OVER parenting, not attachment parenting. After my segment was done, he introduced the next segment and said something to the effect of ‘look at this next attachment parent…’ And went into the segment of the mother breaking in to her daughters home, and the most ridiculous over parenting I have ever seen. What REALLY made me mad was that the shows producer- Alonna Green said Dr Phil was very interested in reading about attachment parenting. I am in school to complete my masters degree in psychology and I am specializing in attachment and attachment disorders. I sent him scholastic peer reviewed articles that back up this parenting style, and he obviously didnt read a single one of them. His credibility as a psychologist is almost laughable in the community as he obviously puts psychology and science on the alter of entertainment.

    Like

    1. sarah Avatar
      sarah

      Maybe the mother who broke into her child’s home was actually doing it for a good reason- maybe what REALLY happened was the daughter lost her keys or the house was on fire. Wouldn’t put it past that show to edit that too. 😉

      Like

  7. Krista Avatar
    Krista

    Thank you for writing this. I was pretty amazed by what was portrayed as typical AP in the segment. I’m still struggling to understand how the mother who breaks into her daughter’s home relates to attachment parenting at all.
    We are an AP family and we do not co-sleep because our 2 year old hates it and asks for her bed. We also say “no” in many ways on a regular basis with love and an explanation. The show made AP families look like a bunch of pushovers who don’t believe in boundaries. It seemed to miss the heart and soul of AP completely- which to me is less about what specific parenting strategies you use and more about valuing your child as a human being worthy of respect rather than an inconvenience or a manipulative monster.

    Like

  8. Sana Avatar
    Sana

    I wont place much stock by Dr. Phil. He after all exploits peoples misery to make money. Harsh judgement I know, thats how I feel about his show. People having to tell their most private matters to the public. They have a right to dignity and privacy which is not respected at all. Sure they agree to it, but it still is disrespectful. May be if Dr. Phil was attachment parented he would have the empathy to see it.

    I am not an ‘attachment parent’ but do most things like that since I come from the east. That is the normally expected way of parenting where I come from. So I am spared the judgment and self doubt of AP parents in the west. We simply respond to our infants cry at an instant because thats the normal thing to do. Kids sleep with their parents because that is normal. Kids have their own rooms yet want to sleep with parents and that is allowed. I myself did that. I had a room and even after I started sleeping there, sometimes went to my parents. Sometimes it was the soffa outside their room. I was listened to and respected. My mother would be outraged at the thought of delibarately letting an infant cry.

    None of it made any of us spoilt. My daughter is ‘clingy’. We simply wait for her to mature in her on pace. We dont push her to become independent. We have rules about when she gets sweet treats and is generally happy to follow them. We use ‘no’ sparelingly but we have a child who is following most rules and limits designed for her good, but not for our convenience.

    I ofcourse dont want to judge non AP parents in the west. It is the sensitivity that matters. Not labels. One can become insensitive in any method, that is when we find extremes and bad outcomes

    Like

Leave a comment